3 ms·
The point is that it is a protest. By emailing bigcorp’s legal team will waste a small amount of their time. Especially if it “sincerely” thanks them for accept
by gghffguhvc 3y ago
The point is that it is a protest. By emailing bigcorp’s legal team will waste a small amount of their time. Especially if it “sincerely” thanks them for accepting your altered terms of service and shares some screenshots of the 200 response etc. doesn’t have to mention what was altered.
Then references Dmitry Agarkov.
V2 could use rocketreach to find individual lawyers at bigco and mail each individually with slightly different messages to create more confusion.
- FFP999 3y agoWell, perhaps. I'm skeptical that this would have any practical effect, but I would definitely love to be proven wrong on this.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> By emailing bigcorp’s legal team will waste a small amount of their time The plugin developer is more likely to be sued than any company lose material amounts of money. That or one would just ignore requests matching that form. > V2 could use rocketreach to find individual lawyers at bigco and mail each individually with slightly different messages to create more confusion This is intentionally generating frivolous requests with the intent of causing damage. You’ve escalated from civil to possible criminal liability. Individually doing something like this is fine. But you have to do it with the intent of resolving an issue. Not causing damage.
- gghffguhvc 3y ago“Mailito:” so the email(s) come from the end user. Anyway, just a thought experiment. Most protests achieve nothing. Likely wouldn’t get approved by browser vendors.
- tptacek 3y agoYou think?