4 ms·
but to say it isn't happening raises a lot of questions. Why do so many firms so widely put mandatory arbritration clauses? why are pro-business arbitrators mor
by RugnirViking 3y ago
but to say it isn't happening raises a lot of questions. Why do so many firms so widely put mandatory arbritration clauses? why are pro-business arbitrators more likely to be chosen (despite, as you hypothesise, equal information)?
could it be that there are simply more pro-buisness arbitrators than pro-consumer? so a random list would have too many for customer representative to strike off?
- fallingknife 3y agoArbitration is quicker and cheaper than litigation. That alone is enough to explain why they want it. There may well be bias, but merely the fact that companies want this is not evidence of it.