3 ms·
Yeah, but then it wouldn't be called an anchor. Just as we reasonably assume the anchor is heavier than water, we can assume it will hit the bottom.
by nandemo 18y ago
Yeah, but then it wouldn't be called an anchor. Just as we reasonably assume the anchor is heavier than water, we can assume it will hit the bottom.
- jcl 18y agoIt is a reasonable assumption, but the term "anchor" can also reasonably be applied to an object expressly intended to anchor a boat, regardless of whether it is attached to a sufficiently long rope to work in all parts of the lake.