3 ms·
> Mentioning that "modern" (12 year old) c++ does not have these problems gets downvoted. I'm not a C++ user but I thought that all of these things are still i
by tubthumper8 3y ago
> Mentioning that "modern" (12 year old) c++ does not have these problems gets downvoted.
I'm not a C++ user but I thought that all of these things are still in "modern" C++, that the new editions only add things, not remove? Are there tools that can automatically rewrite existing code to use the "modern" features?
- harrid 3y agoAnd that's a criticism I can take to a degree on behalf of the language. These relics are still in because mistakes are happening in the governing body. However in practice, they don't matter much. Every CPP dev has a little helper running in the background which immediately flags these mistakes and can auto correct them. It's not an issue, just an annoyance.