4 ms·
name= for name=name? Another major miss-step in recent python syntax evolution, even worse than the worst perl5 obscurities. For sure everybody will read that
by rurban 3y ago
name= for name=name?
Another major miss-step in recent python syntax evolution, even worse than the worst perl5 obscurities.
For sure everybody will read that the name will be empty, and not not the value of the variable with the same name.
func2(=visibility, =frobnification_level) looks much better
- JoBrad 3y agoPerhaps, but it’s also very odd, and potentially confusing.