> You know that how you experience the world is not the world as it is. Your eyes move about constantly but you dont see it This is a different kind of "the wo

> You know that how you experience the world is not the world as it is. Your eyes move about constantly but you dont see it This is a different kind of "the world as it is" vs. "the world as you experience it" difference, as I understand Kant: You can always make more sophisticated interpretations of your direct experiences that accounts for such things as visual or even temporal illusions, but there are things you can never know for sure - for instance, whether time is your consciousness moving through a series of immutable states, like frames on a film reel, or whether it's the reel that is moving. We are constrained from the basic structure of our reasoning from finding answers to such questions. That is very different from illusions we can correct for through better physics theories.