3 ms·
Yes we've had nude stuff before, but part of my point is we've developed as a society since cave times and it might be nice to keep things that way instead of h
by OhioMan2943 3y ago
Yes we've had nude stuff before, but part of my point is we've developed as a society since cave times and it might be nice to keep things that way instead of heading into some AI-driven valueless pit, and abdicating these valuable things because 'it's too hard'.
Also this is more about pornographic content (what is mentioned in the article) than nude art- there's a world of difference between having a crude charcoal sketch, a renaissance painting, and a degrading porn shot of someone.
- poisonborz 3y ago> we've developed as a society since cave times and it might be nice to keep things that way What does that mean - "developed" mind shouln't be interested in sex? Does porn have to be degrading (for both sides)? You should better separate your own bias and then either have a better argument, or see the fallacy.
- imgabe 3y agoWe’ll, I don’t think a value like “your nudity and/or sexuality is an intensely shameful thing and if a stranger sees it, even in a fictional representation, your life is ruined” is such a great thing that we need to preserve. It’s certainly not going to be useful as AI generated images proliferate.