4 ms·
The reaction of many commenters in stories like this is something along the lines of "the is just going to happen, people should just learn not to be bothered b
by allturtles 3y ago
The reaction of many commenters in stories like this is something along the lines of "the is just going to happen, people should just learn not to be bothered by this."
May I ask, does technology exist to serve people or vice versa? I always assumed it was the former. If so, why should we tolerate this technology? Who does it benefit other than bullies and sexual predators?
- dnissley 3y agoCan you specify what you mean by "this" technology?
- defrost 3y agoIMHO the best possible course forward from here is to normalise the hell out of tools that AI photoshop and animate peoples faces with the bodies of animals, in various costumes, weightlifter bodies, etc and crack down on the nude | pornographic potrayals of real people. The upside is getting people used to photorealistic body fake images so that everybody knows that if compromising | embarrassing nudes do show up they're very likely fakes and being put about by people that deserve a bit of scorn. "The technology" is hyper realistic seamless image creation - it has all manner of applications beyond titillating porn for schoolyards, moreover regardless of how we do or do not tolerate it there's no going back in the box. It's time for focusing on judging people as we know them to be and damming tabloids that publish material that's very likely to be faked.
- coffeefirst 3y agoYes, and I have a creeping suspicion none of the people who hold those views are young women. Weird how that works. There's also a straightforward legal path out of this: add it to image and likeness rights. You distribute an unauthorized nude of a specific person the victim can collect $1000 per violation.