Even then, decrying pants-on-head frauds like Craig Wright or SBF doesn't threaten them. They want to put you on the defensive (eg. "But how can you prove _____

Even then, decrying pants-on-head frauds like Craig Wright or SBF doesn't threaten them. They want to put you on the defensive (eg. "But how can you prove _______") or drag you into court ("I accuse you of ______!"). From the perspective of a sufficiently wealthy swindler, you can win every battle with favorable positioning. The fact that SBF's defense fell apart in less than a day signals to me that the system did do a better job than however "Crypto Twitter" held him accountable.