> He seems to have written a book dismissing renewables by assuming fixed technology/costs from 2008 for projection into the future Your impression is incorrec

> He seems to have written a book dismissing renewables by assuming fixed technology/costs from 2008 for projection into the future Your impression is incorrect. As the blog post notes, the problem is that two changes in particular - the reduction in demand, and the absolutely crazy drop in the cost of PV - were far larger than anything mckay was able to reasonable foresee in 2008. > That seems to me that he was set out to dismiss solar and wind and just looked for numbers to confirm this. Almost the opposite, in fact.