3 ms·
> choice between SecureBoot and DRM, or InsecureBoot and no DRM. That's just false. I've had SecureBoot enabled for 10 years and I didn't have more DRM because
by dist-epoch 3y ago
> choice between SecureBoot and DRM, or InsecureBoot and no DRM.
That's just false. I've had SecureBoot enabled for 10 years and I didn't have more DRM because of this.
You're talking hypotheticals, slippery slope, etc...
> The most obvious one is the one where you forgot how to log in
SecureBoot is separate and does not imply full disk encryption. If you choose to use full disk encryption, yes, you can be locked out, with SecureBoot or not.
- immibis 3y ago> I've had SecureBoot enabled for 10 years and I didn't have more DRM because of this. Maybe stop pretending to understand what the parent comment is talking about. > SecureBoot is separate and does not imply full disk encryption. If you choose to use full disk encryption, yes, you can be locked out, SecureBoot or not. There's no purpose to Secure Boot if I can just put your hard drive in a different computer without Secure Boot.
- dist-epoch 3y ago> There's no purpose to Secure Boot if I can just put your hard drive in a different computer without Secure Boot. There are scenarios where you can't take the hard drive out (evil maid attacks, public computers, ...). But regardless, you are attacking SecureBoot with an argument against full disk encryption.