5 ms·
> home lawn -> destruction of the planet Your citations state that lawns consume 60% of household water, implying that this leads inevitably to environmental c
by panarky 3y ago
> home lawn -> destruction of the planet
Your citations state that lawns consume 60% of household water, implying that this leads inevitably to environmental catastrophe.
But household water usage is a small fraction of total fresh water usage.
In a dry region like California, households consume only 10% of total fresh water [0].
In regions that get more rain, households consume a much smaller fraction than that.
If the government could somehow force every household to convert every lawn into cactus and prevent every resident from bathing more than once per week, would that delay the "destruction of the planet" by any measurable amount?
[0] https://www.ppic.org/publication/water-use-in-california/ https://www.ppic.org/publication/water-use-in-california/
- namaria 3y agoClose to 5% total water usage being just to keep the vanity ground colorful seems like a huge waste.
- panarky 3y agoMany things are wasteful. An equivalent amount to grow almonds for export also seems wasteful. Do either of these wasteful uses of water constitute an existential risk to the planet?
- AndrewKemendo 3y agoYes both contribute to the depletion of the freshwater resources available. This is a well documented problem