I struggle to think of the head of every political regime in the last century who based his government on stealing money from the rich and giving it to the poor

I struggle to think of the head of every political regime in the last century who based his government on stealing money from the rich and giving it to the poor, who didn't end up with a palace. Well, apart from the ones that got killed in military coups and such. And I doubt the idea that they were all liars that never believed in what they preached would withstand scrutiny. Suppose, your ethics are unworkable or irrational and you are unwilling to question them. If you think about it, by necessity, you must become more amoral as time goes by. At the very least the luxury of a palace probably helps silence one's moral instincts.