3 ms·
That's correct. Net Neutrality is above solving a problem that doesn't actually exist, even after 12 years and cementing existing internet providers into place
by exabrial 3y ago
That's correct. Net Neutrality is above solving a problem that doesn't actually exist, even after 12 years and cementing existing internet providers into place by making sure regulations are too costly to allow innovative players into the provider space.
- malfist 3y agoThis is a gish gallop of a response. Net hasn't been neutral for a lot less than 12 years. California's law prevented the worst harms of un neutral net. This regulation has not anticompetitive costs. In fact, it forces a level playing field so monopolies can't prevent competition. The problem does exist. Look no further than your cellphone plan.
- zlg_codes 3y agoWhat innovators? I've not seen any innovation in ISPs or network services in over a decade. Social nutworking isn't anything new and has actually harmed society more than it could ever help. ISPs provide access to the Internet the same way your city and power company provide electricity and water. Tax dollars have gone into its building, and they've disrupted much of the country over their shenanigans. In absence of good solutions, mesh networks will pop up.