3 ms·
> He was stealing from rich people Are you sure? My gut says that he mostly damaged not-rich people. I don't know too much about the specific case, but I know
by simonebrunozzi 3y ago
> He was stealing from rich people
Are you sure? My gut says that he mostly damaged not-rich people. I don't know too much about the specific case, but I know enough about the general crypto space to have an opinion, although not sure how to provide data to support it. You don't provide data either, though.
- kodapoda 3y agoI have a growing concern that by engaging with this argument we are making it more acceptable. It's not OK to steal from "rich people". It's not OK to blame everything on the 1%. Online platforms are filled with garbage about the 1%, and most posters are Americans, all of whom actually are in this 1% globally. If you own a car and/or a home - are you rich? Is it acceptable to steal your $1K investment and spend it on pseudo-EA causes? An argument so ethically bankrupt, I can't believe people even type it on a public forum.
- simonebrunozzi 3y agoMy point is not that it's ok to steal from the rich people. My point is that I suspect that SBF stole mostly from non-rich people, which is also NOT ok.
- kodapoda 3y agoMy frustration about engaging with this argument is in agreement with you—sorry if I wasn't clear. The parent commenter made it seem like FTX only defrauded some abstract rich people, which, according to them, would somehow make it more acceptable.