it's likely only 1000 lines of less, sass, scss, or stylus which can be well organized into modules and output compressed css if bandwidth is a concern. It wou

it's likely only 1000 lines of less, sass, scss, or stylus which can be well organized into modules and output compressed css if bandwidth is a concern. It would also be possible to only deliver the css applicable to the user's browser (the vast majority of the lines are redundancies due to vendor prefixes). I don't see it being the case that you couldn't optimize the file size down to about the same size as the equivalent jQuery animation.