3 ms·
We are all going to die! But nuclear power is to expensive, so let's sit in the roads and block traffic and subsidize Teslas for rich people. Either we are und
by WillPostForFood 3y ago
We are all going to die! But nuclear power is to expensive, so let's sit in the roads and block traffic and subsidize Teslas for rich people.
Either we are under an existential threat, in which case nuclear power is an amazingly cheap way to save 8+ billion people, or there is some other agenda at play.
- gpm 3y agoThe primary constraint limiting the speed at which we move away from fossil fuels is cost. Investing in more expensive alternatives like nuclear increases the risk of the threat becoming existential, and the damage it does if it doesn't become existential, compared to investing in cheaper alternatives like solar and wind. It is not a case of "we should do everything" because we can't afford to do everything. If we could afford to do everything we could easily do a small subset of everything and solve the problem.
- WillPostForFood 3y agoHard disagree, the primary limitation is availability of energy. There is no path to 100% solar + wind + storage without mass deindustrialization. Nuclear would stop being expensive if it was committed to. Building 1 bespoke plant avery few decades is not a good approach.
- gpm 3y agoThe article is literally about showing that there is in fact enough solar and wind energy available to fulfill expected (not artificially constrained or "deindustrialized") demand.
- WillPostForFood 3y agoThe article doesn't have a plan for storage, and relies on a plurality of energy from floating offshore wind, which has never been relied on at any scale. There are 4 windfarms in the world generating just 193MW. You are going to bet humanity on that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_wind_turbine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_wind_turbine