It's got to do with (broadly) accessibility / enthusiasm. Enthusiasts are familiar with a lot more, know the domain, and so are able to navigate the intricacie

It's got to do with (broadly) accessibility / enthusiasm. Enthusiasts are familiar with a lot more, know the domain, and so are able to navigate the intricacies. -- There's an xkcd comic which points out that you're probably under-estimating what it takes to be familiar with this stuff. https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2501:_Average_Familiarity https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/2501:_Average_Fam... -- And while it's nice to be enthusiastic about stuff, not everyone's going to have full enthusiasm for everything they do. In terms of accessibility: Having "bad defaults out of the box" just doesn't make sense compared to "having good defaults out of the box". If it's very unusual, or unintuitive to use, that's just added friction to get someone to learn. (And if fewer people adopting a tool leads to a smaller community). There's plenty of stuff which isn't so hard if you know where to look.. whereas, without knowing where to look, it's confusing to navigate. There's a communal cost to having fragmented/bespoke setups; if everyone's using pretty much the same thing, then anyone can help anyone out. -- Someone familiar with the intricacies will be able to understand the differences, but a novice might not know which bespoke thing would be best to copy.