4 ms·
I'd go much further. Either you fix anything that is broken, i.e. bug fixes both security and non-security related, or you should be required to let the people
by gpm 3y ago
I'd go much further.
Either you fix anything that is broken, i.e. bug fixes both security and non-security related, or you should be required to let the people who bought it fix it, forever.
Did you stop supporting Windows 95? Ok, time to put it's source code and build tools into the public domain.
- polygamous_bat 3y agoI would happily be lenient and throw in an extra clause: if you don’t want to do either, give people a full refund for wasting their time on your (now) garbage software.