>The whole point of society is to be able to support those who can't support themselves. And the only way to do that is to threaten those that can support them

>The whole point of society is to be able to support those who can't support themselves. And the only way to do that is to threaten those that can support themselves with imprisonment and death if they don't support the weak? There's no other way where people might voluntarily help those people? You don't see the hyprocisy? >It's not to have a pool of resources from which you can accumulate and hold on to as many resources as you can. And violence is the only solution. >If you are able at all to give up any portion of the fruits of your labor you should be grateful for the conditions set up before you that allowed you to reach such place. Because my parents and grandparents where coerced, I should be grateful and repay them with more coercion?