2 ms·
In general terms I’m in favor of public interest supervision where it’s needed, but I would also be interested in knowing some details of what that supervision
by onionisafruit 3y ago
In general terms I’m in favor of public interest supervision where it’s needed, but I would also be interested in knowing some details of what that supervision is going to be looking at.
Further down the page he brings up the “just and reasonable” standard from Title II. I want to know what behavior he (or the FCC) would consider unjust or unreasonable that isn’t in the realm of blocking or throttling.
- em-bee 3y agothis. while i agree with the claim in the article on principle, it left me wanting. It is the conduct of the ISPs that is in question here. Because telephone companies were Title II common carriers, their behavior had to be just and reasonable. Those companies prospered under such responsibilities; as they have morphed into wired and wireless ISPs, there is no reasonable argument why they, as well as their new competitors from the cable companies, should not continue to have public interest obligations. what were those responsibilities and obligations?