3 ms·
We need a new GPL that includes a clause that prohibits training any sort of AI or statistical model on it, unless the output of that model is inheriting the li
by quonn 3y ago
We need a new GPL that includes a clause that prohibits training any sort of AI or statistical model on it, unless the output of that model is inheriting the license.
Otherwise AI will be the end of anything open - which we can already see in stackoverflow now.
- Zambyte 3y agoInstead of impeding progress with copyright even more than alwe already do, maybe we should repeal copyright altogether.
- quonn 3y agoIt‘s my time as developer and I choose to license my output however I want. Thank you very much.
- Zambyte 3y agoAs a developer I don't think I should have the right to tell other people how to use their computers (even if they're using code that I wrote). Nor do I think that you should... thank you very much :-)
- whartung 3y agoSo, is this an issue of credit, a recognition thing? Or more an issue of just sharing with the “right” people? I share what I do freely. If someone integrates that trivia and shares it with someone else, so much the better. I offer a fractional shoulder to stand on. Getting hovered up into an AI that then goes on to help someone else isn’t much different than having something random posted on the internet that solves someone else’s stumbling block. But that’s just me.