You could sell it at thousands of dollars per gallon, sure, but could you sell it at a price which would support 30 years of mitigation of its effects on the ma

You could sell it at thousands of dollars per gallon, sure, but could you sell it at a price which would support 30 years of mitigation of its effects on the marine ecosystems where the boats go? If it was popular enough to go on enough boats to kill off ten-thousand-year-old coral reefs, could you possibly charge enough to reverse that? If you don't pay for that, you're not charging the full cost of the chemical and instead stealing those funds from the rest of society.