> I gave up completely when his view of why the DOJ keeps losing literally became "the judiciary is corrupt" Why is that your view if that is what literally ha

> I gave up completely when his view of why the DOJ keeps losing literally became "the judiciary is corrupt" Why is that your view if that is what literally happens in a court of law? > The best way to explain Bidenomics is to listen to a judge Biden recently appointed to the D.C. district court, Ana Reyes, who was hostile to the Antitrust Division when they brought a case against two smartlock makers. Last month, Reyes sat on an American Bar Association panel where she attacked the idea of stronger antitrust enforcement, focusing specifically on her skepticism around labor-related claims. She bragged to the audience of defense attorneys that during the antitrust case she heard, she 'pranked' government lawyers by spending three minutes pretending to dismiss their key witness, before saying ‘April Fools. "I have never in my life heard stunned silence," she later said gleefully. > Having a corporate lawyer bully turned judge appointed by Biden killing an antitrust suit brought by Biden officials is a great example of Bidenomics, because it shows the lack of coherence of this administration’s policy. I’m a big fan of Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, but another Biden judge - Jacqueline Corley - let through the largest big tech merger of all time, when Microsoft bought Activision, after Khan challenged the deal. [1] - https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/strikes-and-bidenomics https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/strikes-and-bidenomics