Urgh. People not understanding LINQ misusing like exposed here is painful to watch. Sure, It took me a few head scratches myself originally to understand lazy/

Urgh. People not understanding LINQ misusing like exposed here is painful to watch. Sure, It took me a few head scratches myself originally to understand lazy/unintentional multi-evaluation, but for the original article to still push a PERFORMANCE article through even while the results so clearly say there's something very unexpected happening, boggles the mind. Do not be single-minded and bulldoze a hypothesis even if you are in a teacher's role. This reminds me of the "nothing to see here" police squad scene with the second example being 100x slower being ignored lol