3 ms·

I am not worried about job losses, not that it would be easy to achieve by current ai, nor am i against ai. I am against corporations taking what doesnt belong

I am not worried about job losses, not that it would be easy to achieve by current ai, nor am i against ai. I am against corporations taking what doesnt belong to them and using it against us. Technically speaking if ai would be as capable as you think it would mean that we wouldnt need said corporations since ai can provide all the services they do - otherwise it would be illogical and contradictory to claim ai can do everything under the sun. My beef is with the oligarchy thats eroding our freedoms, privacy, and ownership. You should be too because our democracy and way of life is threatened by them. Ai is just another tool they want to monopolise.

ben_w 3y ago
If the generative AI isn't good enough to take jobs, then the corporations can't use what they've taken against anyone in creative roles. (The personal profile/ad tracking/face tracking AI probably still could be used against people, but that doesn't seem to be part of this thread? Correct me if I'm wrong). > Technically speaking if ai would be as capable as you think it would mean that we wouldnt need said corporations since ai can provide all the services they do - otherwise it would be illogical and contradictory to claim ai can do everything under the sun. That requires all economic tasks to be simultaneously equally susceptible to AI. So far, not so, though this is certainly the goal. > Ai is just another tool they want to monopolise. Can you name a single thing that would go less badly, in the event that all the AI were made public domain?