3 ms·
Such a shame it isn't open source, so it's really impossible to eyeball QoI without actually investing a huge amount of time into the language. (Plus the usual
by Quekid5 3y ago
Such a shame it isn't open source, so it's really impossible to eyeball QoI without actually investing a huge amount of time into the language. (Plus the usual bad things about closed source.)
I have no doubts about the qualifications (or even intentions) of the author, but one feels that a language meant for serious things should have an open implementation and/or standard. Of course, I realize this may not align with Baxter's goals, but it is going mean ~0 adoption.
- pjmlp 3y agoOnce upon a time the only C and C++ compilers that one could get for free, were the ones available alongside UNIX tapes.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]