3 ms·
Nowhere, because that’s not the claim I made. Read my comments again. I said $100 (as a rough estimate) for a QOL comparable to a hundred years ago. Then I said
by keiferski 3y ago
Nowhere, because that’s not the claim I made. Read my comments again. I said $100 (as a rough estimate) for a QOL comparable to a hundred years ago. Then I said a 1950s QOL would cost more than $100 but still be cheaper than most modern spenders.