I have the same thought as you in relation to what I just heard. 60% of the message had to be delivered to reinforce Germany's responsibilities, and the last 40

I have the same thought as you in relation to what I just heard. 60% of the message had to be delivered to reinforce Germany's responsibilities, and the last 40% was great “both sidism” that I would want to hear. My only reservation is that the line of where “criticism of Israel” jumps into “antisemetic rhetoric” seems to be defined by the listener rather than the speaker. How can one express a pro-Zionist, anti-Zionist action, pro-Palestinian autonomy, anti-Hamas action opinion without being called a hypocrite by someone somewhere? It’s not an insane position to hold, but listeners always want to define the speaker as supporting some kind of heinous past.