3 ms·
His being told by his superior officers to not engage in his political opinion is very near an illegal order in and of-itself. The Tea Party website holds a dis
by RollAHardSix 15y ago
His being told by his superior officers to not engage in his political opinion is very near an illegal order in and of-itself. The Tea Party website holds a disclaimer that all posts are made by individuals and are not representation of opinion of the military as a whole. It doesn't matter that he sold anti-Obama bumper bumper stickers, that's voicing your opinion for the next candidate of the next election. The comment "As an active duty Marine, I say screw Obama" may be grounds for reprimand but being forcibly separated? PLEASE.
If you want to pull out the directive knock yourself out, I recommend starting with:
4.1.1.1. Register, vote, and express a personal opinion on political candidates and
issues, but not as a representative of the Armed Forces.
4.1.1.8. Display a political bumper sticker on the member’s private vehicle.
Comparing political dissent to contempt is a joke argument. The lines are shades of grey when it comes to speaking about the Presidency. Contempt would apply when it would come to one's direct chain-of-command not when it covers a political official, elected, into a public office. Everyone has a right to democracy even those who restricted their rights by joining the military.
- geoffsanders 15y agoOk okay, you're right - I, the US military, the Marines, his commanding officers, and all of the legal reviews to date are all just wrong. Laugh.
- RollAHardSix 15y agoI suppose we'll find out soon enough. Sgt. Gary Stein has has filed in Federal Court that the Separation Board ignored the law. Given that they offered no explanation for why they cast their votes in the manner they did added with the legal precedent of US vs Wilcox, it's a bit hard to disagree with him. After a proper review of the board, and the law, in a civilian court we'll find out.