> Given that Mozilla has become more and more politicised it is not unlikely that Baker will insist on doing "more than deplatforming" to those accounts which d

> Given that Mozilla has become more and more politicised it is not unlikely that Baker will insist on doing "more than deplatforming" to those accounts which do not fit her ideology. Mozilla has been quite clear that they are censorious. From their Mozilla.Social "content policies": "To ensure an inclusive and safe environment, hate speech and derogatory language is not permitted on Mozilla.Social." How is "hate speech" defined? Broadly. Moreover, Mozilla recommends people self-censor: "Simply put, if you’re unsure if a word is derogatory, don’t use it." They have similar language in their "Harassment" section: "If you are not sure whether a behavior would constitute harassment, it’s best to avoid that behavior." And if that was unclear: "If you are looking for a social network that permits all speech, without limitation, Mozilla.Social may not be the right place for you." https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/social-content-policies/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/soci...