4 ms·
Hardware compatible doesn’t mean very much in this case. It’s a different ISA so you’ll need a different tool chain and recompilation (possibly rewrite given th
by FastFT 3y ago
Hardware compatible doesn’t mean very much in this case. It’s a different ISA so you’ll need a different tool chain and recompilation (possibly rewrite given that assembly is very common in deeply embedded processors). It’ll also have different LUT usage, etc.
- tails4e 3y agoIt means it's designed as a direct drop in replacent for a traditional microblaze ISA code..sure software must be recompiled, but hardware interfaces match what was there before for peripheral access, debug, instruction offload, etc. This makes the transition to using RISC-v much more seamless if you were already using microblaze