> I posted a list of recent issues I've run into elsewhere in the thread, but there are many bugs and inconsistencies in macos: > > - Doc breaking/becoming ina

> I posted a list of recent issues I've run into elsewhere in the thread, but there are many bugs and inconsistencies in macos: > > - Doc breaking/becoming inaccessible. > > - Running app windows disappearing/becoming inaccessible. > > - Cursor/caret disappearing when editing text. > > - Can't move windows between workspaces. > > - Constant issues with external monitors. > > - Switching between windows via command-tab regularly breaks. > > These are all well-known issues that have existed for years. If you google them you will find threads and workaround from 5+ years ago. I am not pretending MacOS is bug free, again I was just asking for your issues with the OS. But from what I've seen in your replies it seems you post-hoc justified your opinion by googling for known issues. Unless you're claiming you have all of these issues, constantly and consistently? Even a Mac does well with the occasional reboot, I have never had a system that was completely issue free. Be it Windows, Mac or Linux. >> My Mac and Linux shortcuts align more than my Windows and Linux/Mac ones >Because.. you changed your linux shortcuts to match macos? The most obvious example is that ctrl+c/s/v etc are instead command+c/s/v on macos. I literally said in my post that the most common ones have CMD instead of CTRL, this is more than "a bit disingenuous". The reason I prefer the Super + key, is so it doesn't mess with using CTRL+key in the terminal. As that behaviour is running contrary to expectations set by every other OS. CTRL+C doesn't mean copy in the terminal, it means terminate the currently running program. CTRL+A doesn't mean "select all" it means, jump to the start of the line. Programs shouldn't be overwriting OS level shortcuts, though I completely understand how it came to be. It is really counter-intuitive for new users. Super + key makes more sense for OS level shortcuts, as it's literally the Windows symbol on most keyboards. >> I hope you realise that saying “very buggy and inconsistent” without naming anything specific isn’t any less vague and ambiguous than “usability and comfort”. >There are literally dozens of examples of issues listed in this thread. I hope you realize that saying 'give me examples' when there are many many examples all around the post your replying too is a bit disingenuous. I can't keep repeat ing what I've already posted in the thread in every single comment. I don't know how you read, but I read from comment to comment, top to bottom. I'm in the top thread where you made the claims without any examples, I don't know why you expect me to look elsewhere for the examples that you might have posted or not. Nor why you think I would look for other people's issues. If you think that's disingenuous that's your prerogative, I think that's how most people read these thread's including you. You don't need to keep repeating the same thing, you can literally just link your comment with the specifics.