You're effectively saying that you want Apple to design a chip without any compromises in features, cost, performance, or efficiency. Apple sure could design a

You're effectively saying that you want Apple to design a chip without any compromises in features, cost, performance, or efficiency. Apple sure could design a chip that drives more monitors, but maybe they decided that making the chip x% more performance/efficient, or having y feature was more important. Or, maybe this really truly is trivial and they decided to segment their chips by not including this feature. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.