Did anyone read the article? It's literally not a compromise of Okta. It's a compromise of a healthcare provider that Okta is a customer of. Has absolutely noth

Did anyone read the article? It's literally not a compromise of Okta. It's a compromise of a healthcare provider that Okta is a customer of. Has absolutely nothing to do with Okta's products, at all, whatsoever. This is bordering on yellow journalism. I am all for giving shitty companies their due when they fuck up, but that's not what this is at all.