4 ms·
It may take some time for WasmGC to be usable by .NET. Based on the discussions the first version of WasmGC does not have a good way to handle a few .NET specif
by to11mtm 3y ago
It may take some time for WasmGC to be usable by .NET. Based on the discussions the first version of WasmGC does not have a good way to handle a few .NET specific scenarios, and said scenarios are "post-post-mvp". [0]
My concern, of course, is that there is not much incentive for those features to be added if .NET is the only platform that needs them... at that point having a form of 'include' (to where a specific GC version can just be cached and loaded by another WASM assembly) would be more useful, despite the pain it would create.
[0] - https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/issues/77 https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/issues/77
- DylanSp 3y agoInteresting, thanks for the background. Reading through that GitHub issue helps me understand what other comments on here are talking about with the differences between various GCs making it difficult to have a one-size-fits-all WasmGC.