4 ms·
From what I gathered from the article and the linked post on cnet. He was hired for side A and sided with A. Now he was hired for side B and sided with B. Am I
by vibrunazo 15y ago
From what I gathered from the article and the linked post on cnet. He was hired for side A and sided with A. Now he was hired for side B and sided with B. Am I missing something?
- waqf 15y agoNo, although other things being equal it seems more likely that someone would switch in that direction if their current personal convictions were aligned with B. His posting to CNET is worth reading too: http://news.cnet.com/8618-31921_3-57404804.html?assetTypeId=12&messageId=12154966&tag=mncol;txt http://news.cnet.com/8618-31921_3-57404804.html?assetTypeId=...
- oacgnol 15y agoHe was hired for side A, at first sided with A. Then over time he became more educated to the whole situation and became more sided with B, and thusly has switched to side B. In other words, he saw the bigger picture and (surprisingly!) realized that flawed legislation isn't the way to handle the situation as a whole.