3 ms·
Let me give you my reasoning. The piece is largely based on assumptions. We do not know what went on behind the curtains. The chance of him not consulting his p
by theyinwhy 3y ago
Let me give you my reasoning. The piece is largely based on assumptions. We do not know what went on behind the curtains. The chance of him not consulting his parents (who are well versed in law) is very slim. The chance of his parents not consulting other lawyers to get a good grip on the situation: also very slim.
Therefore the idea of him deliberately bringing down his parents by choosing to not plead guilty seems out of this world.
Additionally, it is just too hypocritical imho. Claiming he is bringing down his parents while bringing down his parents.
- sgammon 3y agoBut that’s the point. He did consult his parents, extensively. They took money from FTX, through Sam. They bought a mansion in the Bahamas and filled it with nice furniture, ultimately from customer deposits. We know all of this from evidence which withstood the scrutiny and burden of proof in court. What part is hypothetical?