2 ms·
Ah, you mean the Optional itself being null. That’s not any bigger an issue than anything else being Optional. Also, value types might come combined with nullab
by kaba0 3y ago
Ah, you mean the Optional itself being null. That’s not any bigger an issue than anything else being Optional. Also, value types might come combined with nullability — so you might have Optional<String>!, which can’t be null, and will efficiently be stored in-place.