The Secret Service's criteria[0] make it arguable either way. For example, the polling criteria would argue against him (though I think he's been close): "Whet

The Secret Service's criteria[0] make it arguable either way. For example, the polling criteria would argue against him (though I think he's been close): "Whether, during and within an active and competitive major party primary, the most recent average of established national polls, as reflected by the Real Clear Politics National Average or similar mechanism, the candidate is polling at 15% or more for 30 consecutive days." Based on the video, I think he would argue his strongest case is based on the threat assessment criteria: "A threat assessment conducted by the Secret Service of general or specific threats directed towards the candidate (for these purposes, “threats” should be defined as explicit threats of bodily harm to the candidate or indications of inappropriate behavior towards the candidate suggesting potential bodily harm)." Either way, a nutter who hopefully falls off the charts early in the primaries. [0] https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/leaders/campaign-2024 https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/leaders/campaign-20...