3 ms·

You can call it an accessibility issue. Depending on one's audience, is it or is it not fair to assume that they know what some specific term or idea means? The

You can call it an accessibility issue. Depending on one's audience, is it or is it not fair to assume that they know what some specific term or idea means? They can link to Whisper, they can describe what Whisper is for for anyone who has never heard of that within the context of AI before, but do they also need to provide disambiguations for what "AI" means? Or distillation? model? inference? There are those who might argue (and those like me who merely take a Tellarite stance https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Tellarite https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Tellarite) that they can define the audience for their paper by who would actually choose to use the model that they made or who might try to further refine it. Specifying the audience that way does a fair job of singling out people who don't know what the word "AI" means, and may or may not do a good job filtering out people who have never heard of "Whisper" in the context of AI before. Because who is trying to get a more efficient version of a model they've never before encountered or thought about?

MrDrMcCoy 3y ago
Allow me to clarify: the opening line of a project should do the following: - Inform them what the project does. - Indicate what the audience should be. - Provide enough context so that the definitions of further acronyms and jargon can be returned by a search engine. In my mind, "Whisper is an artificial intelligence voice recognition framework for research and incorporation into other software" would accomplish these things neatly. It need not be as overly verbose as you suggest.