4 ms·
Sounds like a total crank, from the abstract of the paper making the claim[1]: > ... We show that the equivalence of QC techniques (with IBM, Google and others
by gooseus 3y ago
Sounds like a total crank, from the abstract of the paper making the claim[1]:
> ... We show that the equivalence of QC techniques (with IBM, Google and others compared with our version of QC) has been hidden for about 2,500 years – since Pythagoras. All our computations were done in a commercial cellphone, or a commercial Linux desktop, as our QC devices -- opening the user market to many industries. No cryogenics or special materials were used...
According to his profile[2] he also:
> Developed and widely published blockchain in 2001, thus protected and prohibited any patent. Protected by trade-secrets. End-to-end encryption and authentication that is secure and easy to use, and works in any platform without change.
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373516233_QC_Algorithms_Faster_Calculation_of_Prime_Numbers https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373516233_QC_Algori...
[2] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ed-Gerck https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ed-Gerck
- johnklos 3y agoIndeed. "We broke the RSA-2048 key" is the equivalent of "I have no idea what I'm talking about, so I'll just say something slightly less dumb than what you'd see on NCIS".