might have, the other poster is heavily implying that's what happened and the successful one was just lucky. It also might be that the successful one had bette

might have, the other poster is heavily implying that's what happened and the successful one was just lucky. It also might be that the successful one had better judgement and that it _wasn't_ luck. My point is that the current political narrative is strongly that people who are successful are lucky and there's nothing logical about that stance.