> Climate change is a species-ending threat. Emissions caused by fossil fuels is a huge piece of that. It's not a species-ending threat (at least, to humans).

> Climate change is a species-ending threat. Emissions caused by fossil fuels is a huge piece of that. It's not a species-ending threat (at least, to humans). That said, the realistic outlook for global warming is bad enough. EV is a technology in transition. It will get there. It's getting there. It's not "there" yet for every use case. Why? A large part isn't because of the technology, it's about population density. The countries that pollute the most also happen to have sub-par public transportation networks. Range anxiety isn't an issue when the default option for most people is light rail. The solution is likely going to come down to: 1. Urban planning. Car friendly zoning, building codes, minimum parking requirements, and other regulations are starting be reversed in the US. It's already happened across most of the EU. 2. Switch to low emissions electricity generation. Power plants are still the leading emitter, full stop. 3. EV adoption. My point above wasn't an argument against EVs as a technology, but a statement of fact that - as a technology in transition - it's not superior for all major use cases. This should change over the next couple of decades.