3 ms·
We are using Workers for ~12mo now with actually very little actual downtime. There have been some regional issues but no world wide outages. That said we don'
by jpgvm 3y ago
We are using Workers for ~12mo now with actually very little actual downtime. There have been some regional issues but no world wide outages.
That said we don't use any queues, KV, etc. Just pure JS isolates so that probably contributes to the robustness.
We do use the Cache API though and have ran into weirdness there. We also needed to implement our own Stale-While-Revalidate (SWR) because CF still refuses to implement this properly.
Overall CF is a provider that I would say we begrudging acknowledge as good. Stuff like the SWR thing can be really frustrating but overall reliability and performance are much better since moving to CF.
- csomar 3y ago> Overall CF is a provider that I would say we begrudging acknowledge as good. I don't understand. You say that you used a very small subset of their offering in a very specific and limited way; and with that you conclude that their offering is "good"? Shouldn't you make that conclusion after reviewing at least 50% of their offering?
- jpgvm 3y agoAll of those extra features aren't their offering. Their offering is their network, everything else is just icing.