4 ms·
I'm guessing that Poe.com uses the GPT4 api - I struggled to get similar quality answers from GPT4 api vs their web interface. A google wasn't very helpful, sug
by pgryko 3y ago
I'm guessing that Poe.com uses the GPT4 api - I struggled to get similar quality answers from GPT4 api vs their web interface. A google wasn't very helpful, suggesting using a temperature of 0.7 and a custom prompt.
Mostly I wanted to use GPT4 api via the terminal on chunks of text, but was not able to get the same quality as the UI.
I'm open to suggestions
- dr_dshiv 3y agoSeriously, using gpt4 through API is not as good as chatGPT—anyone know why? I’ve wondered this for years. (Ok months)
- nemosaltat 3y agoSame. I wrote an implementation around GPT-4 & sqlite to store and analyze my queries and was hoping to use that exclusively. I still find myself using ~~GPT-4~~ chapGPT, huge shoutout to autodev.py for making that experience worlds better. edit: clarity
- PartiallyTyped 3y agoI observed the opposite tbh. Seems inconsistent?
- maxbaines 3y agoVery likely your initial system prompt, versus chatGPT. Also ChatGPT is more than just an client for the GPT4 API.
- maxbaines 3y agoThat said I see better results mostly via the API and a good prompt.
- YetAnotherNick 3y agoThere is definitely something different. e.g. If I ask to output JSON, ChatGPT sometimes starts with something like "Sure here is the JSON output", while API never does that.
- hn_user2 3y agoInteresting, I have switched over to using chatblade CLI client and had not noticed a degradation in results. Guess I better start trying some queries in both for a bit to compare quality.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]