3 ms·
It’s not necessarily a conspiracy they might have just been unserious or lazy in forcing the world to make a huge change. They sold very few of them because nob
by idontwantthis 3y ago
It’s not necessarily a conspiracy they might have just been unserious or lazy in forcing the world to make a huge change. They sold very few of them because nobody wanted to buy them because there’s no fuel for them. If they wanted to sell them they needed to build a fuel network.
- clouddrover 3y ago> they might have just been unserious or lazy in forcing the world to make a huge change Eh, you want Toyota, a car company, to force you to do things? That's a strange perspective. > They sold very few of them Because they produced very few of them. They still don't make very many. I think we've arrived back at the beginning. You're agreeing that Toyota didn't go "all in" on hydrogen.
- idontwantthis 3y agoTry to ask questions instead of applying your own meaning to my words. We might have had a good conversation that way. You’re right we’re back at the beginning. Have a good day.
- clouddrover 3y agoThere are no questions to ask. You're inventing a narrative that doesn't correspond to the practical reality.
- miguelazo 3y ago>Because they produced very few of them. They still don't make very many. Because they rely entirely on subsidies and there’s no good fuel distribution network. They were very serious about hydrogen, they just expected other companies (ICE age fuel distributors) to build that network.