2 ms·
> which are now more or less a requirement if you don't want to lose your sanity while browsing the web For a long time I wondered why people said this. I don'
by shados 3y ago
> which are now more or less a requirement if you don't want to lose your sanity while browsing the web
For a long time I wondered why people said this. I don't use ad blockers and didn't feel it was that bad.
Then 2 things made me understand. First, I pay for YouTube. If you don't and don't block their ads, they seriously test your patience as you browse. I tried it for less than an hour before I couldn't take it anymore.
The second was looking for torrents and hacks (it was for a legitimate and unambiguously legal purpose too, no gray area, but long story!). Those sites are literally impossible to use without ad blockers. Same thing for tools related to diagnosing PC issues. It's all ads over ads over scams and trying to get you to install some adware as you navigate the site trying to install the actually legitimate tools.
I very rarely do either of those things (YouTube without subscription, and navigating the "gray" web), so I never realized just how fucking awful it can get.
- zamadatix 3y agoHell, I'm a YouTube Premium subscriber and I still have an ad-skipper for all of the in-video promotions. It's not quite as bad as direct YouTube ads have gotten but it's still a noticeable change in itself.
- ecshafer 3y agoI dont think you even need to consider gray web stuff. Your average news site is awful and unisable without an ad blocker.