> Influencing elections is not a harm, even if you disagree with the political ends. It feels icky, but still I mostly agree. I do think there's a limit as I w

> Influencing elections is not a harm, even if you disagree with the political ends. It feels icky, but still I mostly agree. I do think there's a limit as I would consider directly influencing elections (via force or deceit) to be harmful, but I'm largely ok with trying to sway public opinion. > They were notoriously ineffective, which further solidifies this into the non-story bucket. Unfortunately, they were surprisingly effective at the thing I care about which is collecting millions of people's personal information without their knowledge or consent. The fact they turned out to be incompetent does not inspire confidence.