3 ms·
It proves they are a monopoly and harming consumers. Consumer harm is a keystone of antitrust enforcement.
by metabagel 3y ago
It proves they are a monopoly and harming consumers. Consumer harm is a keystone of antitrust enforcement.
- WillPostForFood 3y agoIt proves they are a monopoly It might show harm, but in no way does prove monopoly.
- Groxx 3y agoWhile I largely agree: "knowingly made things worse for consumers and suffered no consequences" does seem like meaningful (but far from sufficient) evidence of excessive control over a marketplace. If things were healthy, you'd expect competition to capitalize on that enshittification.
- metabagel 3y agoIt does prove monopoly, because it demonstrates the exercise of monopoly power.